Teacher Assessment in the Secondary schools of Afghanistan with Reference to Some Parameters of Pedagogical Practices

Main Article Content

Noorajan Atif
Satish Pathak

Abstract

Nowadays teacher performance assessment in education has become significant with a view to enhance the quality of education. It is evident
that this thrust area would lead to quality and excellence in education. It is realized that the most arguable point about teacher assessment
is the improvement of students’ performance and learning outcomes. One of the very debatable issues about quality teaching is that to what
extent a teacher is able to provide a positive learning environment inside the classroom. Similarly, a qualified teacher is also assumed to create
good learning conditions by employing effective pedagogy.
The available studies on Afghan teacher teaching skills (Afghanistan National Education for All (EFA) Review Report, 2015; National
Education Strategic Plan (NESP), Ministry of Education, 2016; Education Sector Analysis Report Draft, 2016 and Mansory, 2010) indicate that the
vast majority of Afghan school teachers employ traditional pedagogy which cannot help learners to advance their ‘critical thinking’ ability and
become ‘autonomous’ learners (Barron and Darling-Hammond, 2008). The above conceptual background and reviewed report of Afghanistan
have inspired the authors to assess the teachers' performance in the secondary schools of Afghanistan with reference to some parameters of
pedagogical practices. The present paper depicts the observed existing pedagogical practices through a series of classroom observation and
attempted to suggest some ideas to overcome the challenges of the teachers.
Journal of Teacher Education and Research (2019): . DOI: 10.36268/JTER/1415

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Atif N, Pathak S. Teacher Assessment in the Secondary schools of Afghanistan with Reference to Some Parameters of Pedagogical Practices. JTER [Internet]. 5Oct.2019 [cited 18Apr.2024];14(01):19-2. Available from: https://jter.in/index.php/JTER/article/view/16
Section
Research Article
Author Biography

Noorajan Atif, Research Schola, Department of Education (CASE), Faculty of Education and Psychology, The MS University of Baroda, Vadodara, India

, Satish Pathak2
1r, 2Professor,
1,2Department of Education (CASE), Faculty of Education and Psychology, The MS University of Baroda, Vadodara, India

References

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning:
A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning
Retrieved from:https://eric.ed.gov
Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing Teacher
Leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.
Ministry of Education of Afghanistan. (2015). Afghanistan education for
all 2015. National Review report. Retrieved from: www.moe.gov.af
Ministry of Education of Afghanistan. (2016). National Education Strategic
Plan for 2017-2021 Draft. Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org
Mansory, A. M. (2010). Do Students Learn? Assessment of math and
language achievements of students at the end of grades 3 and 6 in
SCA supported schools.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Retrieved from:http:/
web.mit.edu
National Institute of Education, Maldives. (2014). National curriculum:
Pedagogy and assessment guide. Retrieved from: https://www.
moe.gov.mv
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009)
The professional development of teachers. Retrieved from:https://
www.oecd.org
Pouras Consult Aps. (2016) Education Sector Analysis. Retrieved from:
http://anafae.af
UNICEF. (2014). Teachers, Inclusive, child-centred teaching and pedagogy.
Retrieved from: http://www.inclusive-education.org
World Wide Fund (WWF-UK). (2010). Learning for sustainability in schools.
Retrieved from: http://assets.wwf.org.uk